Categories
Article Blog CPD Teaching

Whatever the weather: A guide to climate and weather

FutureLearn have published a blog by Sylvia Knight, RMetS Head of Education. It’s an introduction to weather and climate, looking at weather forecasts, climate projections and the attribution of extreme weather events to global warming. 

This relates to Come Rain or Shine, the free, 5-week weather and climate CPD course for secondary geography teachers (and others with an interest in UK weather) which is now running throughout the year. 

Categories
Blog Climate Change Curriculum Schools

A Curriculum for Climate Literacy

We know Why climate education is important, but What should we teach and How should we be teaching it?

The need for better climate education in schools across the UK is undeniable – from calls from young people, teachers and employers and evidence from climate literacy surveys

As the Curriculum is being reviewed/ refreshed in England, Scotland and N Ireland and the new curriculum is being embedded in Wales, there is an ideal opportunity for curriculum designers to assess the opportunities for climate education within their curriculum and, critically, to ensure appropriate sequencing of knowledge, understanding, skills and values across subjects and levels. 

The DfE in England’s Curriculum and Assessment review interim report specifically states that: “Rapid social, environmental and technological change necessitates that the curriculum keep pace; including a renewed focus on digital and media literacy, and a greater focus on sustainability and climate science.”

The Royal Meteorological Society believes that every student should leave school with the basic climate literacy that would enable them to engage with the messages put forward by the media or politicians or to make informed decisions about their own opportunities and responsibilities when it comes to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and also to equip them with the understanding and skills required to thrive in the green careers of the future.

For this to be possible, it is vital that they are able to critically apply their knowledge, understanding and skills to the contexts they encounter in their current and future lives. 

In March 2025, we invited representatives from a broad range of subject and professional organisations to come together in a workshop kindly hosted by the University of Reading.

The aim of the workshop was to begin defining a Curriculum for Climate Literacy which, as part of a much wider curriculum, would equip students with the climate literacy needed for their lives as local and global citizens, and with the skills for careers shaped by a changing climate. By bringing together those with subject and subject-teaching expertise we hoped to develop a well sequenced, coherent, holistic and progressive curriculum.

Critically, what should all students know when they leave school, and what should some students, through their choice of subjects, know to equip them for specific further training/ study and careers?

Since the workshop, we have worked with many of these organisations to establish the Curriculum for Climate Literacy, which we hope those now developing national curricula, exam specifications and school level curricula will find useful. 

The Core Principles of the Curriculum for Climate Literacy:

  • All students should leave school with the necessary climate literacy required to thrive as citizens of a world where the climate is changing, irrespective of their subject choices.
  • Climate literacy includes an understanding of climate science as well as the complex social and economic factors which relate to an understanding of the interaction between people and the climate system.
  • Climate change is a multi-disciplinary problem that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to both learning and solutions. Systems thinking is key, and the climate system (as well as the Earth’s natural, social and political systems) span school subject disciplines.
  • We have aimed to create a well sequenced, progressive curriculum where disciplinary or ‘substantive’ knowledge and understanding is developed progressively and is not repetitive or tokenistic.
  • We have supplied very detailed information – so that this can be implemented in any school curriculum, whatever its national framework. The detail is necessary to ensure equitable provision of high-quality climate education which is not dependent on teacher expertise or awareness.
  • We acknowledge the risk of curriculum overload and have endeavoured to suggest an appropriate amount of content in each subject. However, in some subjects, there does need to be a significant proportion of the curriculum dedicated to climate literacy.
  • The curriculum should have the flexibility to keep up to date with climate science, climate solutions (adaptation and mitigation) and the current state of the world, not least because this keeps it relevant to the skills for green careers options open to school leavers. A mechanism for regular review and update should be a part of the curriculum approach.
  • The curriculum should be flexible enough for teachers to be able to adapt it to local and current contexts.
  • Critical thinking should be embedded throughout the curriculum. It has relevance beyond climate literacy but is particularly relevant here.
  • Teacher support is critical to delivery of this curriculum. We recognise that significant teacher training and CPD will be required to allow confident delivery of high-quality climate education, as well as classroom resource provision.
  • A common language is critical for a curriculum for climate e.g. including consistent definitions at curriculum and setting level and across subjects. For example, when referring to climate actions and solutions in this document, we include mitigation, adaptation and, where appropriate, loss and damage payments, on a personal to global scale.
  • This is a Curriculum for Climate Literacy, not specifically for biodiversity or wider sustainability or environmental issues, whilst recognising that these topics are not entirely separable from climate literacy, because that is where our (RMetS) expertise lies.
  • This is a curriculum of hope, focussed as much as possible on actions and solutions as well as students’ futures, such as green careers, whilst still developing sound understanding of climate change and its far-reaching implications.
  • Subjects with a strong connection to a related career in climate change have these links explicitly developed within them, helping to meet Gatsby Benchmark 4: ‘Linking curriculum learning to careers.’
  • We have highlighted sequencing links to other subjects but assumed progression within the same subject (e.g. across the sciences).
  • Climate literacy supports global and local citizenship.
  • Climate literacy supports stewardship of the Earth and its resources.
  • This curriculum is focussed on knowledge and understanding. Skills & values constitute an equally vital part of a complete and coherent curriculum, as do the pedagogical/ how to teach aspects.

Access the full document for the detailed recommendations according to subject and level. 

In compiling this Curriculum for Climate Literacy we have drawn on the work done by many organisations including, but not limited to, UNESCO’s Greening Education Partnership, TIDE, CAPE and SOS-UK.

Other core RMetS activities including quality controlling teaching and assessment resources, running an annual survey to assess the climate literacy of school leavers across the UK, and delivering teacher training.

Categories
Blog Climate CPD Geography Secondary Teaching Weather

More For Teachers’ CPD video series released

Back in 2021 we released the Weather and Climate Teachers’ guide,  accompanied by resources for the classroom and teacher CPD.

We are now happy to announce that the CPD ‘More For Teachers’ documents are now available as a series of short films on our YouTube channel.

The videos, like the guide, are aimed at secondary geography teachers to support the delivery of weather and climate lessons to 11–14+ year old students. They are not linked to any specific curriculum and should support teaching across all of the UK.

See the first video here:

Categories
Blog Climate Change Curriculum Geography

New Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Adaptation Resource Collection

We are delighted to publish a new collection of classroom resources, aimed at 14-16 (GCSE) geography teachers and students, exploring climate change, extreme weather, and adaptation to it. 

Some of the resources in the collection were already available on MetLink, but most have been created for us by Rob Gamesby (Cool Geography) and are based on RMetS funded research, just completed, by Jiashu Zhu at Cambridge University. The research focusses on the causes, impacts and effectiveness of adaptation measures to river flooding in Sheffield, Extreme heat (heatwaves) in Cambridge and monsoon flooding in Pakistan. 

Teachers at GA25 playing adaptation Top Trumps
Teachers at the Geographical Association conference 2025 playing adaptation Top Trumps, one of the resources in the new collection
Categories
Blog Curriculum maths Primary Teaching

Practice SATs Questions with climate context

RMetS have answered a call to make some KS2 SATs practice questions with weather and climate contexts.

These questions are taken directly from the last three years of SATs papers (specifically maths papers 2 and 3), with numbers changed to fit in with the updated context.

Context is wide ranging. Some questions refer to wildflowers, insects and grow-your-own vegetables to connect with young people’s love of nature and to empower them to act positively towards nature and our climate. Other more obvious connections include questions about the seasons, flooding, public transport and renewable energy.

Questions have been broken down into topic and are in PDF form, and available as Word documents (to make it easy to copy and paste) together with the answers for teachers (or students to self or peer mark).

Primary Maths Blackboard
Categories
Article Blog Curriculum Extreme weather Geography Teaching

Storm Bert Blog: A case study navigating the truth about flooding

The RMetS education team have written a guest blog for Geography Southwest. Geography Southwest is a project to promote geographical education in the South West of England and beyond by creating and offering a wide range of resources to support the wider geographical community.

Storm Bert: A case study navigating the truth about flooding in a changing climate details the lifetime of Storm Bert, which caused significant damage back in November 2024. In particular, flood damage caused by the River Taff (in Wales) bursting its banks, really highlighted the need to continue but also improve our adaptation methods.

In the blog we also address some of the misconceptions of how our weather here in the UK and weather further afield  is changing. It is crucial that we understand what trends have been identified in our climate system by climate scientists, in order to develop and establish effective adaptation methods.

Make sure you follow the link at the bottom of the page to get the FULL blog!

Storm Bert - Satellite Picture
Satellite picture of Storm Bert. © Crown copyright, Met Office

We also recently wrote a careers article for Geography Southwest, exploring the term ‘green careers’, ‘green skills’ and available resource for students with an interest in a career in weather and climate, particularly with a geography background.

Make sure to scroll down to the button of the page to get the full article!

Categories
Blog Climate Change Curriculum Teaching

The role of subjects and subject associations in climate change and sustainability education in England

This report published by UCL is the outcome of an event held on 16 July 2024 which brought us and other professional and subject associations together to discuss the roles that they, and the subjects they represent, play in climate change and sustainability education in schools. 

Categories
Blog Schools

Celebrating the International Day of Education

Today UNESCO are celebrating the International Day of Education, recognising the role of education for peace and development globally. The role of education is becoming ever more important as the global society develops in the face of a changing climate.

Climate education is one of the most effective forms of climate action, and the foundations should be laid at school. Climate education should not only ensure ‘climate science’ literacy, but also focus on climate action and solutions and look at both the roles of individuals and organisations or administrations, all whilst steering away from causing climate anxiety.

But are the current curricula across the UK providing the climate education to ensure students leave school with the basic climate literacy, enabling them to engage with messages put to them by the media or politicians, and to make decisions about their own personal responsibilities? The Society believes that school education should ensure that students do leave school with exactly this level of climate literacy.

 

The Society’s current and future education work

The Society’s Education Team works to support the delivery of climate education, whether that be supporting changes to the curricula, providing weather and climate CPD for teachers, or providing classroom resources.

Today, we would like to highlight and celebrate some of the work the education team is currently working on, and what there is to look forward to in the first half of the year:

  • Launching and collecting responses for the 2025 Climate Literacy Survey

If you teach, or communicate with those who do teach:

  • Year 11 (England/ Wales)
  • Year 12 (N Ireland)
  • S4 (Scotland)

Please participate in the 2025 Climate Literacy survey.

This builds on the 2023/2024 Climate Literacy report that was published by the DfE at the end of 2024. By collecting data annually, we hope to evidence the impact of changing curricula and other education policies or national scale interventions on the climate literacy of school leavers across the UK.

  • Developing new climate change adaptation resources for GCSE geography

These new resources will feature two new extreme weather case studies, including a heatwave case study in the UK. The resource will also support the teaching of global adaptation strategies, a term the 2023/2024 Climate Literacy Survey identified poor understanding of.

 

  • Weather and Climate subject days for Geography PGCE students

We provide a subject specific training days to students training to become geography teachers. Secondary geography teachers probably have the best opportunity to deliver climate education in the current curricula. Supporting the foundation of their weather and climate knowledge will strength the teaching of current and future students and reduce the misconceptions which we often see being taught.

With the education team growing in 2024, we have been able to reach more courses and students than ever before.

 

  • Weather and Climate: A Teachers’ Guide – More for Teachers CPD videos

The Education team are making 20 new short videos to support teachers’ CPD. These videos accompany ‘Weather and Climate: A Teachers’ Guide’, a scheme of work for geography students aged 11 – 14+ years, and closely follow the CPD material, ‘More for Teachers’, published alongside the guide.

Categories
Blog Climate Change Research Schools

Participate in Climate Literacy Survey 2025

climate literacy

Following on from the DfE’s publication of the results of the climate literacy survey of school leavers in 2024, we are now looking for schools to participate in this year’s survey. 

As the DfE are no longer funding the collection of data, we are able to open the survey up fully to schools in Scotland, N. Ireland, Wales and England. 

By collecting data annually, we hope to evidence the impact of changing curricula and other education policies  or national scale interventions on the climate literacy of school leavers across the UK. 

If you are in a school which teaches year 11 (England/ Wales), year 12 (N Ireland) or S4 (Scotland) please take part

Climate education is one of the most effective forms of climate action. But is our current curriculum equipping school leavers with the knowledge, skills and understanding about green careers and the impact of climate change on themselves and their communities?

We are looking for mixed ability, mixed subject choice classes – so this might be best run with forms than, say, with a geography class. It should take 5-10 minutes and should be completed online and in school. The teacher will need to remind students of the school’s postcode

We will not ‘mark’ or share students responses either to individuals or to the school, so please stress to students that there is nothing to be gained by looking up answers or copying others’ responses

Each students will be given 5 questions which are the same for everyone, and 5 which are different. These questions have been developed by climate experts and been through cognitive testing with young people. 

For Wales, England and N. Ireland we will be collecting data until the end of March 2025. 

For students in Scotland, the survey will remain open until the end of June 2025. 

We are hoping to collect large quantities of data from a wide range of settings so that we can start looking for patterns in the data.  

 

Categories
Blog Climate Change

DfE Climate Literacy Survey 2024

climate literacy

We are delighted that the DfE have published the results of the 2023/ 2024 Climate Literacy Survey of school leavers (year 11 students), which builds on the initial survey we developed in 2022. Together with an expert group of Society members, we supported the development of the additional 50 questions which were included in the survey this year and we also contributed to the analysis of the data collected.

UNESCO’s Greening Curriculum guidance states that high quality climate education should develop an “action-oriented, holistic, scientifically accurate, justice-driven and lifelong learning approach to climate change”.

This survey is a very important piece of evidence about the state of climate awareness amongst our young people, as well as the key gaps in the climate education they are currently receiving.

One clear message that has emerged from the survey every year, is how poorly the 1.5°C/ 2°C key climate goals are understood, as many respondents thought that the climate had already warmed more than this and most failed to select the correct definition.

Related to this, the concept of ‘Net Zero’ is very poorly understood. As this is a phrase which is in widespread use, from politicians to schools, employers and the media, lack of understanding of it is both surprising and concerning.

Unsurprisingly, there is a correlation between those school leavers who think that climate change will affect them directly and those who are concerned about climate change.

In designing climate education and communication strategies, we rightly consider the need to avoid developing climate anxiety. However, the survey shows that, although most school leavers are ‘fairly concerned’ about climate change more are ‘not very’ or ‘not at all’ concerned about climate change than are ‘very concerned’. We should therefore make sure that our focus is on making young people ‘concerned and hopeful’ as only this will lead to effective individual and collective climate action.

One important way to do this is through demonstrating the relevance of climate change to young people, their communities and careers.  However, the data collected in the survey showed very low awareness of climate change in the UK, including projected impacts as well as adaptation and mitigation strategies already in place or needed, as well as the cost benefits of mitigation. This will be directly relevant to school leavers’ awareness of the green careers and wider climate action available to them.

A significant proportion do not appreciate that future global warming can still be limited or avoided, highlighting an opportunity for increasing ‘hope’ in climate action amongst young people. Similarly, there was low awareness of the extent of existing renewable energy production in the UK – again missing messages about hope and green careers.

Some specific issues related to the current National Curriculum in England were highlighted by the survey. For example, respondents had poor awareness of the fact that the expansion of water as it warms has contributed roughly as much to sea level rise as the melting of ice. This argues for the need for a curriculum which encourages the application of knowledge and understanding (in this case, that liquids expand when they are heated) to real world contexts or across subjects (i.e. from science to geography).

Another example relates to the current KS3/ 4 geography curriculum where the disproportionate amount of time devoted to teaching past climate change and in particular the Milankovitch cycles seems to have led to respondents overestimating the impact of natural forcing mechanisms on recent climate change.

A concerning finding from the survey relates to perception of the level of scientific consensus on climate change, with most respondents thinking agreement amongst scientists is significantly lower than it is. This potentially relates to the use of the ‘evaluate’ command word in geography assessments, which necessitates students to present arguments from both sides even if, in reality, the debate is essentially one sided. 

While most school leavers recall having been taught about climate change, only just over half remember having covered it in their last year at school when all should have encountered it in GCSE science. 

However, reassuringly, the responses indicated that students place a relatively high level of trust in their science teachers as sources of climate change information. This reinforces the need for teachers to have the time and support to keep their own subject knowledge up to date and relevant. 

In delivering high quality climate education and communication, we need to be very careful to avoid confusion between climate change mitigation strategies and other sustainability issues. The data collected in the survey demonstrated confusion in particular relating to the impact of the production and use of plastics.

Related to this, there was low awareness of adaptation and mitigation strategies generally, and in particular of effective mitigation actions. The impacts of keeping pets and eating meat on greenhouse gas emissions are generally underestimated whereas the impact of switching lights off and recycling (from the point of view of greenhouse gas emissions) is overestimated. Whether or not a focus on personal carbon footprints (as opposed to that of products, services or organisations) is helpful, this potentially reflects the impact of decades of teaching the ‘easier to handle’ aspects of sustainability, particularly in primary schools. 

Climate justice recognises the fact that the people and countries most vulnerable to climate change are often not the ones who have done the most to cause it. Respondents indicated a good awareness of which countries are currently emitting most greenhouse gas, but less awareness of per capita or historical emissions. Similarly, there was limited understanding of regional variations in future temperature changes and their impacts.

The current curriculum review in England may provide an opportunity to improve the climate education delivered in schools.

As the DfE will no longer be funding the delivery of this piece of work, we, the RMetS, plan to run the survey ourselves in all four nations of the UK in the 2024/ 2025 academic year and annually thereafter, in order to track the impact of any changes in curriculum or education policy over time. We collected some baseline data in Scotland and Wales in 2024/ 2025.

Summary of the report’s findings

  • Just over half of respondents (55%) remembered learning about climate change recently, stating they were aged 15-16 years when they were last taught about it in a lesson at school.
  • The majority of respondents ‘didn’t know’ (31%) or overestimated (52%) the extent of global warming since 1850.
  • Respondents correctly indicated that natural changes are generally the least impactful (46%) on global warming. However, there was an overestimation of the contribution from transport (46% thought it contributed more than it does) and disposal of plastic waste (49% thought it contributed more than it does) and a corresponding underestimation of the role of industry and deforestation, agriculture and other land use changes.
  • More than half of the sample (54%) indicated some concern about climate change.
  • Almost half of respondents (49%) appreciated that climate change will impact them personally, with 11% expecting a “great deal” of impact and 38% indicating quite a bit.
  • Respondents showed a good understanding of the difference between weather and climate and of the definition of climate change.
  • When exploring the causes of global climate variability, respondents tended to overestimate the impact of changes in the Earth’s orbit, but generally appreciated the impact of changes in greenhouse gas concentrations. There was low awareness of the role of large-scale weather patterns.
  • Carbon dioxide and methane were well recognised as greenhouse gases, water vapour and nitrous oxide less well.
  • Oil and coal were well recognised as fossil fuels, natural gas less well.
  • Whilst respondents demonstrated a good awareness of which countries are currently emitting most greenhouse gases, there was less understanding of historical emissions or per capita emissions.
  • Burning fossil fuels and deforestation are well recognised as sources of carbon dioxide (CO2), however, cement and decomposition were less well recognised.
  • Respondents demonstrated a good understanding that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) has increased over the past 500 years, with 83% correctly identifying an increase.
  • The majority of respondents (61%) correctly identified livestock as a major source of methane (CH4). However, there was lower awareness of other major sources of methane including landfill and waste, wetlands and rice cultivation.
  • Whilst respondents were aware of the different sources of greenhouse gases, there was also confusion between methane and carbon dioxide and their respective sources.
  • Only 18% of respondents correctly identified that over 80% of global climate change since the industrial revolution has been caused by people.
  • There was a good understanding that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are the main contributing factor impacting the Earth’s temperature.
  • Respondents presented a variety of perspectives on the stability of the Earth’s climate system, with most recognising its gradual nature (35% gradual, 24 threshold, 17% fragile).
  • There was a good awareness of common indicators of a warming climate such as melting glaciers (79%) and rising sea levels (74%), as well as the impact of climate change on extreme weather events.
  • Awareness of geographical variations in future temperature changes and their impacts was weaker.
  • While respondents demonstrated awareness of the general vulnerability of countries to climate change, they often lack an understanding of how these vulnerabilities vary by region.
  • The majority of respondents (51%) correctly identified the correct definition of adaptation to climate change, but only 34% correctly identified the correct definition of mitigation.
  • Larger numbers consistently responded that they didn’t know what mitigation is than indicated that they don’t know what adaptation is.
  • The majority of respondents correctly identified planting trees in towns and cities (60%) as an adaptation strategy. However, fewer (48%) identified building flood barriers and only a quarter (25%) recognised installing window shades as an adaptation strategy.
  • Related to this, the data reveals a tendency for school leavers to think that mitigation strategies are adaptation strategies, as well as a low general awareness or understanding of mitigation strategies.
  • Almost a quarter of respondents indicated that they thought that global temperatures would keep rising if anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases were halted, implying low awareness that global warming can still be mitigated.
  • Only one in five (20%) of respondents were able to identify the correct meaning of ‘net zero’ which is a term widely used in the media and across a diverse range of organisations and employers, whilst twice as many respondents indicated that they did not know (40%). Nearly a third (31%) stated that they didn’t know what the 2°C climate change target was and fewer than one in five (17%) correctly identified it as referring to a global average temperature increase above pre-industrial levels.
  • Whilst only 6% of respondents said that they didn’t know what a zero carbon footprint was, there was a general underestimation of the impact of diet or keeping pets and an overestimation of the impact of recycling on greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Half of those sampled (50%) correctly identified carbon capture and storage as the ‘process of trapping emitted carbon dioxide (CO2) and storing it securely’, 21% recognised it as ‘a way of mitigating climate change’ and only 10% were aware that it is part of the UK’s net zero strategy.
  • Whilst over half of respondents recognised that agriculture could reduce greenhouse gas emissions, most school leavers did not recognise that a broad range of other industries could also do so.
  • Around a third of respondents (34%) correctly identified that the UK climate will become warmer and wetter during winters as the global climate warms.
  • Almost three quarters (74%) of respondents correctly identified that the UK climate will become hotter and drier during summers as the global climate warms.
  • The majority (64%) of respondents correctly identified ‘melting glaciers and ice sheets’ as contributors to relative sea level rise around the UK. However, far fewer correctly identified ‘Expansion of sea water as it warms’ (35%).
  • There was generally good awareness of climate change risks in the UK, particularly of coastal flooding and extreme summer heat.
  • Only a third of respondents (33%) correctly recognised that it will cost more for the UK to adapt to climate change impacts compared to implementing policies to limit climate change. A higher proportion, 45%, thought that it will cost more for the UK to implement globally agreed policies to limit climate change.
  • One in 11 respondents (9%) correctly indicated that all of the industries suggested will have to adapt due to the impact that climate change is having on their business. Agriculture (57%), transport (54%) and food supply (52%) were selected by the majority of school leavers.
  • The majority of respondents indicated a high awareness of solar (76%) as a source of electricity, potentially demonstrating that they appreciated that the solar panels they see on house roofs contribute to the UK’s energy mix. Awareness was lower for other renewables such as offshore wind, nuclear fission, hydroelectric, biomass and on-shore wind.
  • The majority of respondents (74%) overestimated the UK’s reliance on fossil fuels for the generation of electricity and underestimated the contribution of renewables to UK electricity generation (72%).
  • Only 22% of respondents thought that between 80-100% of scientists agree on human-caused climate change and 35% thought that fewer than 60% of scientists are in agreement.
  • The data shows that 35% of respondents correctly identified the UNFCCC’s role in global climate policy and 22% correctly identified the IPCC’s role.
  • Respondents place a comparatively high level of trust in science teachers (76%) and news sources such as the BBC (58%) for information about global warming, while expressing lower trust in sources including social media (33%), the Prime Minister (26%) and tabloid newspapers (21%).
MetLink - Royal Meteorological Society
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experienceBy clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info